Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Brown v. Kocoras
as 1:2010cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Charles P Kocoras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2009cv05863
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
P.O.E. O'Neill, P.O.B. Warchol and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. LSF6 Mercury REO Investments et al
as 1:2009cv06309
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown and Queenester Brown
Defendant:
LSF6 Mercury REO Investments, Vericrest Financial, Inc., CIT Group Consumer Finance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown et al v. Ghosh, M.D. et al
as 1:2009cv02542
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown and Liping Zhang
Defendant:
Partha Ghosh, M.D., Dr. Peters, Margaret Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv04192
Defendant:
Marshall Bruce Mathers, III, Usama Bin Laden, Darryl F. Zanck Institute for Media Domination and Talmudic Studies, The and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2008cv06336
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown and Michael Brown
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv06256
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Edgar Hernandez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Comer v. Housing Authority of the City of Gary Indiana et al
as 2:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Robert L Comer
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Gary Indiana, Margo Richmond, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dishman v. Cleary et al
as 1:2007cv05626
Plaintiff:
Richard Dishman
Defendant:
Thomas Cleary, Keith Deitelhoff, Patrick O'Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
