Cases 51 - 60 of 235
Varnauskas v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2020cv04136
Defendant:
Scanning Lawrence, Dee Dee Brookhart, IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Varnauskas
Petitioner:
Steven J Varnauskas
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Nicklaus
as 4:2020cv04133
Plaintiff:
Tracy Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Service List and Sonja Nicklaus
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bashiru v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Robert Guardian, Damon Acoff and others
Petitioner:
Abdulfatai A Bashiru
Defendant:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jobes et al v. Dart
as 1:2020cv02247
Plaintiff:
Service List and Adam R Jobes
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Puessuer
as 1:2020cv01497
Defendant:
Puessuer and Service List
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls et al v. VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC
as 1:2020cv01522
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Walls and Terryll Ann Walls
Defendant:
VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC and Service List
In Re:
Subpoena Issued to First Internet Bank of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05804
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Cook v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv00558
Defendant:
John Muller, John Doe #1, Sabrina R. Canchola and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Phillippo et al
as 1:2019cv00752
Defendant:
J. Matena, Officer Phillippo, M. Jones and others
Amicus Curiae:
Service List
Plaintiff:
Keyon A. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01347
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Renz, Service List and others
Plaintiff:
Robin W Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
