Cases 61 - 70 of 86
BEST v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00205
Petitioner:
ALVIN MARK BEST
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLABAUGH et al v. STRUXTUR INC et al
as 1:2012cv00528
Defendant:
BEST FLOORING INC, BIG BOB'S FLOORING OUTLET OF AMERICA INC, CDC APPLIANCES INC and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE SLABAUGH and MATTHEW SLABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Best v. USA
as 2:2012cv00076
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dennis D Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEST FLOORING, INC. v. M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK
as 1:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
BEST FLOORING, INC.
Defendant:
M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Best v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv00484
Plaintiff:
Judy N Best
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARRIVALSTAR S.A. et al v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00676
Plaintiff:
ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, BEST BUY PURCHASING LLC, SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BATESVILLE SERVICES, INC. v. BEST BUY CASKETS & URNS CO.
as 4:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
BATESVILLE SERVICES, INC. and BATESVILLE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
BEST BUY CASKETS & URNS CO. and ELLIOTT MOORER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
