Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Parker v. Navarrette et al
as 1:2012cv09645
Plaintiff:
Sean R Parker
Defendant:
Sandra Navarrette, John Gray, Aendri Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seidelman v. City Of Aurora et al
as 1:2012cv06725
Plaintiff:
Michael Seidelman
Defendant:
City of Aurora and Marco Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jackson v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2012cv02633
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
City of Aurora, County of Kane, Aurora Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MILLER v. VOHNE LICHE KENNELS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00054
Defendant:
AMERICAN WORKING DOGS UNITED, INC., CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CITY OF AURORA and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2011cv09293
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Mark Rodriguez, Martha Rodriguez and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollingsworth v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2011cv04597
Plaintiff:
Artero Hollingsworth
Defendant:
City of Aurora, C Earwood and M. Worcester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Corry Mills
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Jeffrey Hahn and Aurora Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Brooks v. City of Aurora, Illinois, et al
as 10-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS, a municipal corporation, DOUGLAS RASHKOW, #126 City of Aurora Police Officers, GEORGE LILL, #128 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
