Cases 61 - 70 of 839
SIMS v. JENSEN et al
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
JENSEN, YARBER, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
CALVIN LYONS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
JASON B. FORREST
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ORR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER, DEANNA DWENGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. RIGGS et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
RIGGS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledesma v. Gary Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Frank Ledesma
Defendant:
Gary Railway Company, United States Steel Corporation and Terry Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
VERBLE v. ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
SHAWN J. VERBLE
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, FRANK P LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
