Cases 61 - 70 of 582
Derksen v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Roy Charles Derksen
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Fond du Lac County, Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grayson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
John Grayson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Service Inc, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condon v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02461
Plaintiff:
Christopher Condon
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Justin Jurkowski, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Whitehead, Luke v. Huffman, Katie et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Luke L. Whitehead
Defendant:
Katie Huffman, Srg. M. Sinclair and John/Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wisnauski v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v Blades et al
as 3:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Mark Davenport
Defendant:
Deb Bledsoe, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Percy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
TransUnion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinde v. Wooley et al
as 3:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stinde
Defendant:
Sarah C Wooley, S Waiker, Joshua Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
