Cases 61 - 70 of 153
Grissom, Terrance v. Dehaan, Sue et al
as 3:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Terrance Grissom
Defendant:
Sue Dehaan, Kevin Carr and Tony Evers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Henderson v. Cathy Jess, et al
as 22-1829
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHY JESS, VICKI SEBASTIAN, KRISTEY JELLE and others
Terrance Shaw v. Paul Kemper, et al
as 22-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL S. KEMPER, Warden, JACK F. CHIOVATERO, RANDY MILLER and others
Williams, Quentrell v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Quentrell Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, M. Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Wells et al
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Love, Jr
Defendant:
Jason Wells, Kevin Carr, Lt J Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peete v. Copeskey et al
as 2:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peete
Defendant:
Kim Copeskey, Michael Gollinger, Neil Thoreson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forester-Hoare v. Radtke et al
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Green Bay Correctional Institution, Warden Radtke, Warden Haese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Stibbe v. Tony Evers, et al
as 22-1455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN STIBBE
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY EVERS and KEVIN CARR
Henderson v. Litscher et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Crandall Henderson
Defendant:
Jon Litscher, Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus West v. Kevin Carr
as 22-1332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS WEST, also known as MANSA LUTALO IYAPO
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN CARR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
