Cases 61 - 70 of 86
McNulty, Ned v. Schimke, Larry et al
as 3:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Larry Schimke, Cole and David Hansher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03117
Plaintiff:
Lathierial Boyd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Ned B Hubbard, Thomas Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Sean Kendrick
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Gary Hamblin, Danielle LaCost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kubitz v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ned Kubitz
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ned I Price and Susan M Price
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNulty, Ned v. Schimke, Larry et al
as 2:2013cv01295
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Larry Schimke , Cole and Mike Urban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNulty, Ned v. Schimke, Larry et al
as 3:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Larry Schimke, Cole and Mike Urban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Bartels
as 1:2013mc00004
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ned Bartels
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Kilgallen et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Danni-Lynn Kilgallen, Ned R. Korpela, United States of America, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
