Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Colvin et al v. Indy Marble & Tile Co et al
as 2:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred A Colvin , Joseph Bramlett , William Solivais and others
Defendant:
Indy Marble & Tile Co and Larry K Neville, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Neville v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC
as 1:2009cv05194
Plaintiff:
Delores Neville
Defendant:
Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nevilles v. Hathaway et al
as 2:2009cv02141
Petitioner:
Nashawn L Nevilles
Respondent:
Jody Hathaway, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nevilles v. Hathaway et al
as 1:2009cv03327
Petitioner:
Nashawn L. Nevilles
Respondent:
Jody Hathaway and Atorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neville v. Grenade LLC
as 1:2008cv01026
Plaintiff:
Michael E Neville, Jr
Defendant:
Grenade LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Neville v. Ryker
as 1:2008cv04458
Petitioner:
Richard Neville
Respondent:
Lee Ryker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Neville Williams
as 08-2474
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NEVILLE WILLIAMS
Kranish et al v. Hogshead et al
as 3:2008cv50083
Plaintiff:
Shaun A Kranish and Svetlana Kranish
Defendant:
Thomas A Hogshead, Simon A Avery, Randall E Paul and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mango et al v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2007cv00322
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mango, Thomas Mango, Thomas Mango and others
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc and FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
