Cases 71 - 80 of 166
Jimmy Cichocki v. Kimberly Foxx, et al
as 21-2290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY CICHOCKI
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY M. FOXX, JOEL L. GREENBLATT, ORLANDO CARRENO and others
Dukes v. Washburn et al
as 1:2021cv03672
Plaintiff:
William Dukes
Defendant:
James Washburn, Rolando Rodriguez, Darlene Sobczak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv03431
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Kim Foxx
Plaintiff:
Tina Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper, Kevin v. Novak, Susan et al
as 3:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Sgt. Craft, CO Organ, Brian Gustke and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubblefield v. Reese et al
as 1:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Jared Stubblefield
Defendant:
Ryan Reese and Kimberly M Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01592
Defendant:
Alex Lopez, Benjamin Kibugi, Agustin Cervantes and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Romeo and Jose Juan Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Gallegos
as 1:2021cv00617
Defendant:
Timothy Evans, Kimberly Foxx, Joseph Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Respondent:
Evans, Amanda Gallegos, Executive Director, Cook County Jail, Bitar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Martin v. State of Illinois, et al
as 21-1149
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES, KIMBERLY M. FOXX, CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jobes v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv07700
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections Director, Lisa Madigan, J.B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Ryan Jobes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
