Cases 71 - 80 of 238
Donald Jackson v. Robert Carter, et al
as 21-1711
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. SMITH, NEAL FETZ, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD L. JACKSON
NISSLEY et al v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00880
Defendant:
C. HARPER, A. NEAL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY NISSLEY and STEVEN NISSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDNER v. MOUSER et al
as 1:2021cv01422
Defendant:
FARLEY, MCCANE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
IAN WAYNE GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Plaintiff:
CORDAY DIXON
Defendant:
J. KENEKHAM, FISHER, M. SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT-BERRY v. GEO GROUP INC THE et al
as 1:2021cv01290
Plaintiff:
JAVON L CROCKETT-BERRY and JAVON CROCKETT-BERRY
Defendant:
C.O. SPARKS, GEO GROUP INC THE, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. FALCONER et al
as 1:2021cv01305
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. NEMORE and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett-Berry v. Geo Group Inc The et al
as 3:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Javon L Crockett-Berry and Javon Crockett-Berry
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, Geo Group Inc The, Jhon Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMONDS v. ISSACS et al
as 1:2021cv00641
Defendant:
M. ISSACS, GEO GROUP INC., WEXFORD HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HAMMONDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURVIS v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
WILLARD PURVIS
Defendant:
GEORGE C. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO), GEO GROUP, INC., PRESIDENT, GEO CORRECTIONS AND DETENTION, GEO, GROUP, INC. and GEO GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTYRE v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00573
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, J. FRENCH, WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MCINTYRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
