Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 156
PITTMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01877
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: MARJORIE PITTMAN
Unknown: Stuart Lee Goldenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Products Liability
Reid et al v. Homeland Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03321
Plaintiff: Margie Reid and Danny Pittman
Defendant: Homeland Capital, Inc. and Law Offices of John F. Stimson LTD., The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pittman v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00357
Plaintiff: Eric Lamont Ranae Pittman
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08508
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elder v. Gawlowski et al
as 1:2017cv06573
Plaintiff: Emperor Elder
Defendant: R. Gawlowski , A.M. Skokal , City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Darling Ingredients Inc.
as 2:2017cv00351
Plaintiff: Brian Pittman
Defendant: Darling Ingredients Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN et al v. UNION ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS CLINIC, LLC
as 2:2017cv00393
Plaintiff: HPW CENTER FOR DIABETES, LLC and MD ISAIAH PITTMAN, IV
Defendant: UNION ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS CLINIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Pittman v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00592
Petitioner: Raymond Harold Pittman
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pittman v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00544
Petitioner: Raymond Harold Pittman
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pittman v. Hoskins et al
as 1:2017cv04567
Plaintiff: Denzel Pittman
Defendant: Charles Hoskins, Thomas W Fleming, Paul Winfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?