Cases 71 - 80 of 165
RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00356
Petitioner:
RICKY LEE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beckwith v. Durocher et al
as 2:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Nicholas M Beckwith
Defendant:
Glenn Durocher , Matthew Rodriguez and Lake County Sheriff The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-KASSAR v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
as 2:2018cv00086
Defendant:
AMY ADAMS, BUREAU OF PRISONS, N. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL-KASSAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. AMC Showplace Theaters, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
Maria Rodriguez
Defendant:
National Retail Properties LP , George Doe and American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04171
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ALMA RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez et al v. The RV Factory, LLC
as 3:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Janelle Rodriguez and Raphael Rodriguez
Defendant:
The RV Factory, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
RODRIGUEZ v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv03644
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
THADDEUS L. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
D. ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00465
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
TERRI LYNN RODRIGUEZ
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only), SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RODRIGUEZ v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00413
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
JOSE G. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
