Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Schering-Plough Healthcare Pro v. Schwarz Pharma, Incorporated, et al
as 09-1438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHWARZ PHARMA, INCORPORATED, KREMERS URBAN, LLC, BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED and others
Radunz v. Schwarz et al
as 3:2009cv00015
Petitioner:
Randall Arthur Radunz
Respondent:
David H. Schwarz and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maldonado v. Barrett et al
as 3:2008cv00104
Petitioner:
Daniel Z. Maldonado
Respondent:
Patricia A. Barrett and David H. Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brinkley v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brinkley
Defendant:
Wyeth, Inc., PLIVA, Inc. and Schwarz Pharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mark v. Douglas County Jail Administrator et al
as 2:2008cv00004
Petitioner:
Jonathon M Mark
Respondent:
Douglas County Jail Administrator, Barb Kode-Brown, Eric Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. RAEMISCH et al
as 3:2007cv00673
Plaintiff:
Daniel Z. Maldonado
Defendant:
RICK RAEMISCH and David H. Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv05291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Clayton v. Schwarz Pharma LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00673
Plaintiff:
Barbara Clayton
Defendant:
Schwarz Pharma LLC and Kremers Urban LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
