Cases 81 - 90 of 2,170
HILL v. SCOTT
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
COREY L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03593
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ida Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
James Owens
Defendant:
. Scott, . Bradshaw, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MADDY et al
as 2:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MADDY, PEACH, ERIC HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meneses v. NIK, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv15272
Plaintiff:
Rusdael Ramirez Meneses
Defendant:
NIK, LLC, Anthony Nardo and NIK, LLC an Illinois limited liability company d/b/a Joey's Red Hots Crest Hill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14993
Plaintiff:
Patrice Hill
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curtiss
Defendant:
Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
