Cases 81 - 90 of 633
Warith Muhammad, I v. Paul Rivera, et al
as 22-2699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARITH R. MUHAMMAD, I
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL RIVERA, LEBRON JAMES and SPRINGHILL COMPANY
RIVERA-VALLE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
DANIEL N. RIVERA-VALLE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL BYRD and SHELBY CRICHFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ-RIVERA v. USA
as 1:2022cv01936
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ RIVERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Roberto Cruz-Rivera
as 22-2866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA
USA v. Roberto Cruz-Rivera
as 22-2644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA
Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Jasper Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, FBOP - USP Thomson and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RIVERA v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RIVERA
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, DENNIS REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Gonzalez et al v. Santana et al
as 1:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Elva Ma. Martinez-Gonzalez, Aurora Carrillo, Maria M. Figueroa Mendez and others
Defendant:
Victor Santana, Nicholas Santana, John Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rivera-Figueroa v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Hector Rivera-Figueroa
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
