Cases 81 - 90 of 14,205
Karalow et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Brian Karalow and Catherine Karalow
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Thomas v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Julian Thomas
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Louis C. Cordogan, Inc. D/B/A Cordogan Clark & Associates v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv03171
Plaintiff:
Louis C. Cordogan, Inc. D/B/A Cordogan Clark & Associates
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Bani Foods Inc. v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Bani Foods Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reginald Strother v. USA
as 24-1441
Petitioner:
REGINALD STROTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
JALEN DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trammell v. Mooney et al
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Martin Trammell
Defendant:
Jonathan Mooney and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Medical Malpractice
Graham v. USA
as 3:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
Erin F. Graham, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
