Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jose Contreras-Ortiz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3271
Petitioner:
JOSE J. CONTRERAS-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Faber v. Jaburek et al
as 1:2023cv07227
Plaintiff:
Earl Faber
Defendant:
Derek Jaburek, Malte Roling, J. Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Defrancisco et al
as 1:2023cv14096
Plaintiff:
Antonio Butler
Defendant:
Defrancisco, Ajmai, Correa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olejniczak et al v. West Wing Live, LLC
as 1:2023cv04674
Plaintiff:
Lacey Olejniczak and Karina Contreras
Defendant:
West Wing Live, LLC, d/b/a Radius and West Wing Live, LLC doing business as Radius
Contreras v. Eversole, et al
as 1:2023cv05269
Plaintiff:
Miguel Contreras
Defendant:
Joseph Eversole, Unknown and Unnamed Police Officers and The City of West Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv05267
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CONTRERAS
Defendant:
JOSEPH EVERSOLE, UNKNOWN AND UNNAMED POLICE OFFICERS and THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
