Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Dickerson v. Duval et al
as 3:2024cv03202
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Illinois, Joseph Felchner, Springfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o TODD DUVALL v. CLARK
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, TODD DUVALL and RICHARD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00583
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duvall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04012
Plaintiff:
Dash A Duvall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Duvall v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02533
Plaintiff:
Mark Duvall
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
