Cases 1 - 10 of 652
PERKINS v. LANE
as 1:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Lane v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04432
Plaintiff:
Teresa Smith-Lane
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERKINS v. LANE et al
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LANE and BARTHOLOMEW CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERKINS v. LANE
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
JAMES DARRIN PERKINS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ortega et al
as 1:2024cv04485
Plaintiff:
Tyrie Williams
Defendant:
Elvis Ortega, Kevin Stephans, Paul Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. AFAM Concept, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Deforia Lane
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cooper, Demetrius v. Michlowski, Dr. et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cooper
Defendant:
Dr. Michlowski, Tonya Wesner, Dr. Kerry Kuffenkan and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
