Cases 1 - 10 of 2,702
Below v. Heidi Brown, et al
as 24-1995
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. BELOW
Defendant:
HEIDI BROWN, C.O. (Proknower), DARYL FLANNERY, PHILLIP FRIEDRICH, C.O. and others
Sitter v. Sage Specialty Pharmacy Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Gregory Sitter
Defendant:
Sage Specialty Pharmacy, Inc and Jon Phillips
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anthony-El v. Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Javier Anthony-El
Respondent:
Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit, State of Illinois and Jesse Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stonehart et al v. Now Health Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04436
Plaintiff:
Phillip Stonehart and Moussa Kouyate
Defendant:
Now Health Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PHILLIPS v. ERNEST et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERNEST, JACKSON, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MIKE ELLIS, JESSE and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless and Boost Moble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarty v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Roger McCarty
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Phillip Martin, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
