Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SINGLETON v. WEXFORD HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02322
Plaintiff:
MARKUS SINGLETON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC and MARTIAL R. KNIESER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON-BEY v. BILLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv00023
Defendant:
J. FENWICK, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, STEPHEN W. ROBERTSON and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SINGLETON-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02892
Plaintiff:
DENZEL SINGLETON
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINGLETON BEY v. HTCF et al
as 1:2019cv05062
Defendant:
HTCF, IDOC and GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. SINGLETON BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON BEY v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv01977
Defendant:
M. TRUEX, GEO GROUP INC, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. SINGLETON BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON BEY v. MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 6 et al
as 1:2019cv01875
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS, COUNTY CLERK, MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 6 and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. SINGLETON BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON BEY v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv01877
Defendant:
M. TRUEX, GEO GROUP INC, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. SINGLETON BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Tony Cantu
Defendant:
Crawford, French, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2019cv01316
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
KEVIN SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
