Cases 1 - 10 of 19
ASHER-BUTLER v. AMAZON KDP et al
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
ALLEN LEE ASHER-BUTLER
Defendant:
JEFF BEZOS and AMAZON KDP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ASHER-BUTLER v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv01438
Defendant:
CHARLES EMERSON, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
ALLEN LEE ASHER-BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02112
Petitioner:
GEOFFRIE ALLEN LEE DILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ASHER-BUTLER v. IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
ALLEN LEE ASHER-BUTLER
Defendant:
IDOC, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Powell et al
as 3:2022cv02174
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Lee
Defendant:
J. Powell, Anthony D. Wills, Wexford Health Sources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILL v. GRUBE et al
as 4:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
GEOFFRIE ALLEN LEE DILL
Defendant:
GRUBE, GRONDA, ELFONSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Geoffrie Dill
as 21-2672
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEOFFRIE ALLEN LEE DILL
Lee v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02228
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, A. Diaz, Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv04136
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer, Tom Dart and Lt. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Royers et al
as 1:2019cv02862
Defendant:
G. Muskat, S Manis, Z. Finn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
