Cases 1 - 10 of 22
DRAKE v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. DRAKE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv05848
Plaintiff:
Amanda M Williams
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. D/B/A ABBOTT NUTRITION, Abbott, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payne v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
Smith, . McCarthy, Amanda M Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv02598
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
C/O Smith, C/O McCarthy, Amanda M Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Budde v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Budde and Amanda M Budde
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commisioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EDMONSON v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv00090
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. EDMONSON and AMANDA MARIE EDMONSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Machara v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00303
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. MACHARA and Amanda M Machara
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bierer v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00747
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Amanda M Bierer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MITCHELL v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00046
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. MITCHELL
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Giegler et al v. Abele et al
as 2:2018cv01120
Defendant:
Porshia Lewand, Captain Bacon, Mr Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda M Giegler and Thomas L Giegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
