Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hrabusicky v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv03068
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Unknown Nurse in Montogomery County Jail, Unknown Doctor in Montogomery County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Hrabusicky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hrabusicky v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01227
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Unknown Nurse in Montogomery County Jail, Unknown Doctor in Montogomery County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Hrabusicky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. City of Decatur et al
as 3:2017cv03268
Plaintiff:
Charles Palmer
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Tim Carlton, Roger Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. Legacy HealthCare Financial Services
as 1:2016cv09147
Defendant:
Legacy HealthCare Financial Services
Plaintiff:
Michael Applegate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. G Mac Mortgage et al
as 1:2015cv10393
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams and Angelita Summerize
Defendant:
G Mac Mortgage and David Applegate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Applegate et al
as 1:2012cv06087
Plaintiff:
Tom Franklin
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage Company and David M. Applegate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2012cv02667
Plaintiff:
Keith A West
Defendant:
Kennedy, Roberta Honeycutt, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv03488
Plaintiff:
Shaheed F. Muhammad
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Williams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
