Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singleton, Marcus v. Mr. Brooks et al
as 3:2021cv00792
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Singleton
Defendant:
Librarian Mr. Brooks and Business Officer Mr. Eting
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Merritte v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2020cv04148
Defendant:
Yolanda Navar Guererro, Illinois Department of Corrections, John Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Merritte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard, Charles v. Kool et al
as 3:2019cv00724
Defendant:
C/O Bliss, C/O Morris, Sgt. Broadbent and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Sheppard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackshear v. Thurston et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Cpt Giermoth, Cpt Welgand, Cpt Westra and others
Plaintiff:
Julian R Blackshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clapp, David v. Morales, Amy et al
as 3:2017cv00443
Plaintiff:
David Scott Clapp
Defendant:
Amy Morales , Rebecca Peterson , Business Office Jackson Corr. Inst. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Lewis v. John & Jane Does, et al
as 16-2516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN & JANE DOES, Warden(s) of Dixon Correctional Center, JOHN & JANE DOES, Major(s) of Dixon Correctional Center, JOHN & JANE DOES, Business Office and others
Williamson, alias Mark Howard v. Engelson et al
as 1:2016cv03332
Plaintiff:
Clarence B. Williamson, III
Defendant:
Tracy Egelson, Tarry Williams, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Doehling et al
as 2:2015cv01253
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Booth
Defendant:
L Doehling , Sharon Moerchen, C Barter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
