Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mathew Williams, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2585
Petitioner:
MATHEW CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and YOHANCE CHRISTIAN MILLINGTON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
STEPHENS v. MCMANN et al
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER MCMANN, CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, SGT. ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Williams
as 23-1929
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Garrison v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Julius Garrison
Defendant:
Christopher Williams, Michael Olsen and Jeremiah Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Nonwinggler et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams, Linda Williams and Lynesha Williams
Defendant:
Nonwinggler, MCJ, BHD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Eddy et al
as 1:2022cv06934
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY A. BERRY, II
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY, HUGHETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernes v. Boone County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 3:2022cv50251
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Hernes
Defendant:
Boone County Adult Detention Facility and Bobby Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
