Cases 1 - 10 of 2,574
SMITH v. JENNINGS et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
CASSANDRA JENNINGS, MARY SIMS and SARA CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2024cv03260
Defendant:
. Smith, . Jenkins, Sherretta .. and others
Plaintiff:
Lesean Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv01320
Defendant:
Adam Desrochers, Tiffanie Clark, Brad Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50374
Defendant:
Watson, Hefferman, Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv08117
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Wendy, Tina and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMES v. HUNT et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
HUGH HUNT, CLARK COLTOM, ANN MISCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Booker v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50344
Defendant:
William Bruno, Mirella Susnjar, Jane Marinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRAVORN v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
HERMON TRAVORN
Defendant:
BRIANNE DOOLEY, MILLER, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
