Cases 1 - 10 of 10
AMCO Insurance Company v. Chronister Oil Company et al
as 3:2021cv03143
Plaintiff:
AMCO Insurance Company and Depositors Insurance Company
Defendant:
April Mohn and Chronister Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Walsh v. Regional Care Association et al
as 1:2021cv02040
Defendant:
Kathy Chronister, Regional Care Association and Regional Care Association Simple Plan
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Morgan v. Pfister et al
as 1:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Latonya Williams, Kelly, Chronister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2020cv05431
Defendant:
Walberg, Chronister, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Ellean Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Wexford Health Source, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dimitrius Thomas
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc, Randy Pfister, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phillips 66 Company v. Chronister Oil Company et al
as 3:2014cv03124
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
Chronister Oil Company , Grady Chronister and Linda Chronister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United State Of America v. Chronister Oil Company et al
as 1:2013cv08424
Plaintiff:
United State Of America
Defendant:
Chronister Oil Company and Wendy Chronister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tapp v. Chronister Oil Company, a/k/a QIK-N-EZ et al
as 1:2013cv01465
Plaintiff:
Michael Tapp
Defendant:
Chronister Oil Company, a/k/a QIK-N-EZ, Grady Chronister, individually and Christie Rios, individually
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
