Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Coke v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10952
Plaintiff:
Mary Coke
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Cokes, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COKES and ISIAH STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and DEAN W. EWING
Gilbert v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv02669
Plaintiff:
Robert Gilbert
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Adewale Kuforiji, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv03198
Plaintiff:
Robert Gilbert
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Adewale Kuforiji, . Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pabst et al v. The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company et al
as 1:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
Wesley Pabst and Katherine Pabst
Defendant:
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company, WEC Energy Group Inc. and The Broydrick Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chittick v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2020cv03252
Defendant:
Steve Meeks, Jane 3 Doe, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chittick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
