Cases 1 - 10 of 4,723
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
Terry v. White et al
as 1:2024cv04003
Plaintiff:
Dimari Terry
Defendant:
Raymond White, Reinaldo Sanchez, Jerrell Danner-Lardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03795
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03741
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Brinson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03739
Plaintiff:
Kavarian Rogers
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Murphy v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03745
Plaintiff:
Celena Murphy
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarzembowski v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2024cv03584
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Jarzembowski
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wells v. Cook County Department of Corrections 3 Annex Building Living Unit B2 et al
as 1:2024cv03468
Plaintiff:
Chartise L Wells
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections 3 Annex Building Living Unit B2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Sroga v. Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
as 24-1725
Petitioner:
KEVIN SROGA
Respondent:
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
