Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bennie Stafford v. Tony Evers, et al
as 23-1575
Petitioner:
BENNIE U. STAFFORD
Respondent:
TONY EVERS, Governor of Wisconsin, JOSHUA L. KAUL, Wisconsin Attorney General, DAVE RIEWESTAHL, Eau Claire County Sheriff and others
James v. Merrillville Indiana Police Station et al
as 2:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Merrillville Indiana Police Station and Lake County Indiana County Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Najee Devontae James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALLAN v. PADGETT INC. et al
as 4:2016cv00218
Defendant:
QUEENIE AVERETTE, ALLISON BALL, MATT G. BEVIN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENNAN JAMES CALLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HOPSON v. RAINEY et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hambrick v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2013cv04420
Plaintiff:
Edward Hambrick
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept., State of Illinois Attorney General and Cook County Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Illinois State Police et al
as 3:2013cv50116
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Winnebago County Attorney's Office, R. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Thornton v. Breckenridge County Circuit Cl, et al
as 12-3068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERKS OFFICE, BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY SHERIFF, BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY ATTORNEY and others
THORNTON v. 46TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGES et al
as 1:2012cv01092
Defendant:
46TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGES, BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY ATTORNEY, BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERKS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
