Cases 1 - 10 of 10
EASTRIDGE v. HARRISON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 4:2012cv00113
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEATRICK, JAMES GOLDMAN, HARRISON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EASTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2012cv00029
Defendant:
ZACHARIAH NATHAN ADAMS, NATHAN WAYNE BANET, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TONY L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIMBERLAKE v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2012cv00022
Defendant:
DENNIS BYRD, MICHAEL DEATRICK, JAMES GOLDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS TIMBERLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEARMAN v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00123
Defendant:
MIKE DEATRICK, HARRISON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEE STEARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BALD v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00053
Defendant:
ZACHARIAH NATHAN ADAMS, SHEILA BARBER, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN BALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIPPEY et al v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00044
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NATHAN WAYNE BANET, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CRYSTAL THOMPSON and JOHANNA RIPPEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2010cv00155
Defendant:
MIKE DEATRICK, DEPUTY MCCULLOUGH and DEPUTY SCHULTZ
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY J. POWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
