Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Batson et al v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08301
Plaintiff:
Sharon Batson and Douglas C. Batson, Jr.
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KENNEMUTH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS C. KENNEMUTH
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Armstrong v. Watkins et al
as 1:2019cv01030
Defendant:
Matthew Ray, Jacob Beck, Daniel Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BROOKS v. CITY OF CARMEL et al
as 1:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
GARY W. BROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF CARMEL and DOUGLAS C. HANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
K.R., a minor v. OSF Healthcare System et al
as 1:2018cv01042
Defendant:
OSF Healthcare System , Bradley Nitzsche , Michael Leonardi and others
Plaintiff:
K.R., a minor and Shreze Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin Calibration Inc. v. Woeckner
as 1:2017cv02605
Plaintiff:
Martin Calibration Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas C. Woeckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LENNON et al v. CITY OF CARMEL INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv02072
Defendant:
JAMES BRAINARD, CARMEL CITY COUNCIL, CARMEL, INDIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE B. LENNON and ROBERT SANFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harroun v. Village of Bloomingdale, et al
as 1:2015cv03109
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Harroun
Defendant:
Village Of Bloomingdale, Elizabeth Spontella, Angelo Tenerelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bostic v. McGinnis et al
as 1:2011cv01413
Plaintiff:
Henry A Bostic
Defendant:
Douglas C McGinnis, Gary Millard, Steve Nott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
