Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BEAN et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2016cv00886
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE BAKER-MALLORY, MATTHEW BEAN, EDWARD E BELL and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Pierce v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Paul E Pierce
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
David Pierce v. Linda Runge, et al
as 13-3155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA RUNGE, DOCTOR CHHABRA, Acting Head Medical Director at Shawnee Correctional Center, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ and others
Pierce v. Runge et al
as 3:2013cv00773
Plaintiff:
David E. Pierce
Defendant:
Linda Runge, Dr. Chhabra, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv13204
Plaintiff:
Kelly E. Pierce
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Brighton Collectibles, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00966
Plaintiff:
Patricia E. Pierce
Defendant:
Brighton Collectibles, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pierce v. Greenwood et al
as 1:2009cv01945
Plaintiff:
Jay E Pierce
Defendant:
David Greenwood and Chad Bauman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PIERCE
as 4:2008mc00008
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRIAN E. PIERCE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PIERCE
as 4:2008mc00007
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRIAN E. PIERCE
M.S. et al v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NORTH MONTGOMERY SCHOOL CORP. et al
as 1:2008cv01101
Plaintiff:
M.S., ANITA SWANER-TEMPLETON and ANITA SWANER-TEMPLETON
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NORTH MONTGOMERY SCHOOL CORP., NICOLE MAXWELL, KENNETH BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
