Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Harber et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harber, Nicholas Irvin, Stephen Looney and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SJC Coroner Patricia Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robbins v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Sue, Room Care Tech and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Ezell Excavating Inc et al
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Kyle Miller
Defendant:
Ezell Excavating Inc, Illiana Construction Co, Open Road Paving Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NEVILLE v. USA
as 1:2022cv02326
Petitioner:
EZELL NEVILLE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parker v. Radtke
as 2:2021cv01361
Petitioner:
Darion Ezell Deandre Parker
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ezell v. IDOC's Tactical Team of May 11, 2021 et al
as 3:2021cv01434
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ezell
Defendant:
IDOC's Tactical Team of May 11, 2021, David Mitchell, Percy C. Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. Most et al
as 2:2021cv02105
Plaintiff:
Emmett Ezell
Defendant:
John Doe, . Most and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv01322
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis Ezell and Adam Daywone Ezell
Defendant:
Psych Busch, Nurse Block, Lt Brosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGNEW JR. v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01993
Plaintiff:
EZELL AGNEW JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ezell v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00644
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Adam Davis Ezell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
