Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Gentry v. Randall Hepp
as 23-3321
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY B. GENTRY
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Warden, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Jarre H, Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Dodge Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Sidney R Gentry and Sidney Raynard Gentry
Defendant:
Dodge Correctional Institution, Warden of Dodge Correctional Institution and Jason Benzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Bolingbrook Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv04146
Plaintiff:
Harold Robinson
Defendant:
Bolingbrook Police Department, Mark J. Fleszewski, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04239
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gentry
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gentry v. Wisconsin Department Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jamal D Gentry
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Corrections and Melody Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
