Cases 1 - 10 of 1,007
Markel American Insurance Company v. Ulanski et al
as 1:2024cv03303
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jason Ulanski, Eliasard Alcauter, Jacob Biros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
TANISHA N. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Haselect Medical Receivables Litigation Finance, et al v. Simon H. Clark
as 24-1883
Plaintiff:
HASELECT MEDICAL RECEIVABLES LITIGATION FINANCE FUND INTERNATIONAL S.P. and GRIFFIN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
SIMON H. CLARK
Gatz v. Fabian et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Plaintiff:
Randy Gatz
Defendant:
Tiffany Fabian, Deorea Sunday, Shantina Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allison v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Allison
Defendant:
James M. Neal, Tyler J. Griffin, City of Bridgeport, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Odesza LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation and Odesza LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, dongxinhao, fuzhoushitaijiangquaishenggongyipinshanghang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
