Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NOBLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NOBLE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Yang et al
as 2:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Littleton Emmett Jackson
Defendant:
David Yang, Montrel Bridges, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Noble et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv00615
Defendant:
Clarey, Pollard, J Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
CORDON X BENNETT
Defendant:
CHAPMAN, RON GIBSON, HOLLOWAY and others
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US Foods, Inc. v. Michael J. Noble
as 15-3119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
US FOODS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. NOBLE
US Foods, Inc. v. Noble, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2013cv03640
Plaintiff:
US Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael J. Noble and Phillip G. Roszak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Noble v. Astrue
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv08530
Plaintiff:
Bernard J Noble
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Noble v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2011cv11926
Plaintiff:
Linda J. Noble
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.