Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11903
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv09306
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Greenleaf and Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Johnson et al v Marsh, M.D. et al
as 2:2019cv00204
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Greenleaf and Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
Queen Marsh MD and North Shore Health Centers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON et al v. GREEN VALLEY CARE CENTER et al
as 4:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
JUDY BROSHEARS, JACQUELINE JOHNSON, DALE WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
GREEN VALLEY CARE CENTER and BILLIE FAYE MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv05673
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05013
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
Inc. Zimmer and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
