Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pasut et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01081
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John Pasut, Margaret Pasut, John Daniel Pasut and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AKERS v. PLASSE
as 2:2020cv00392
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE
Plaintiff:
JOHN DANIEL AKERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
as 1:2019cv01049
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN DANIEL WEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2013cv07882
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosby v. Prisoner Transport Extradition Agency et al
as 2:2013cv01141
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Crosby
Defendant:
Prisoner Transport Extradition Agency and Sgt Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06959
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Martin
as 1:2013cv01435
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Ray
Defendant:
Brian Martin and Tazewell County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission v. Clickbooth.com, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv09087
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Clickbooth.com, LLC, IntegraClick, LLC and John Daniel Lemp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
