Cases 1 - 10 of 697
Anderson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03330
Defendant:
Jon Loftus, LaToya Hughes, Candice Riles-Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Bory et al
as 3:2024cv50477
Defendant:
Joel Bory, John and Jane Doe and AIRBNB, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Banks v. Does
as 2:2024cv01502
Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruetten, Jacob v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2024cv00817
Defendant:
2nd Shift Sgt. Restrictive Housing Unit, Dr. Gamboa, Nurse Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ruetten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Thoreson et al
as 2:2024cv01467
Defendant:
Rebecca Shult, Sylvia Opin, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Does
as 2:2024cv01459
Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Armond Moore
Defendant:
. Lochard, John or Jane Doe, Lisa Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotto v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00921
Defendant:
Katina Murray, Joshua Snow, Montrel McGee and others
Plaintiff:
David Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Gripentrog et al
as 2:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R Thompson
Defendant:
Jim Muenchow, John and Jane Doe and Jacob Gripentrog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. JONES et al
as 2:2024cv00516
Defendant:
CARDEN, B. HENDRICKSON, ROGER JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, MICHAEL S. GORBEY and TSUNAMI KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
