Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Utter et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jerome Walker
Defendant:
H Utter, G Trzebiatowski, C Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Perkins v. James Koehler, et al
as 24-1508
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PERKINS
Defendant:
JAMES KOEHLER, DANIEL CUSHING and JOHN KIND
Lubner v. City of Cedarburg et al
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Mary Lubner
Defendant:
City of Cedarburg, Michael McNerney, Dustin Koehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hawkinson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
David R Hawkinson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Bureau of Health Services, Virginia H Trzbiatowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forester-Hoare v. Kind et al
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Kind, Cpt Cushing, Swiekatowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kampa v. City of Cedarburg et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Erik Kampa
Defendant:
City of Cedarburg, Michael McNerney, Dustin Koehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Perkins v. CPS Koehler et al
as 2:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lawrence, Eric Norman, Emil Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
