Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Santiago Diaz v. Evelyn Blanchard, et al
as 23-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANTIAGO DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
EVELYN BLANCHARD, CLAUDIA G. DOWTY, JEANIE L. STEPHENS and others
STEPHEN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01794
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE L. STEPHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02021
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BERRY L. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stephens v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv04207
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L Stephens
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc , Abbott Laboratories , Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2014cv01242
Plaintiff:
Teresa L. Stephens
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PREWITT v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2014cv00061
Defendant:
KEVIN BRANHAM, DENISE BROOKS, RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L. PREWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, JOHN CARAWAY, JOHN AND JANE DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICALS and others
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
