Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. Carlson
as 3:2024cv50153
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Judy Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv50144
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General and McHenry County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Illinois Attorney General et al
as 3:2022cv50042
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois Attorney General, Judy Carlson and Erika Ryl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Lake v. State of Illinois, et al
as 22-1119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOGAN BRADLEY LAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JUDY CARLSON, MARY BACCAM and others
Logan Lake v. Damon R. Leichty
as 22-1093
Petitioner:
LOGAN BRADLEY LAKE, also known as Prince Logan Bradley Lake and Logan B. Lake
Respondent:
DAMON R. LEICHTY
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2021cv50444
Plaintiff:
Prince Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Judy Carlson, Mary Baccam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan Lake v. U.S. Court of International Tr
as 21-2374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOGAN BRADLEY LAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Lake v. Pope Francis et al
as 3:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Logan Lake, Prince Logan Bradley Lake and Prophetic Spirit
Defendant:
Rome Catholics, The Holy See and Pope Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
