Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv01353
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Hammond Police and Thomas McDermott, Jr
Plaintiff:
Herbert N. Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Campbell v. The Transgender Committee et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer McDermott, Cynthia Radtke, TCI's Multi-Disciplinary Team and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Rose Campbell and Ms. Campbell, mark a.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. McDermott et al
as 1:2024cv05469
Defendant:
Thomas McDermott, Jr., John Does #1-4 and Hammond Police Officers/Chief
Plaintiff:
Herbert N. Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
McDermott v. Adams Plastics Corporation
as 1:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
Adams Plastics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
May v. Foreman et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
Dr Garcis, Division of Hearings and Appeals Commissioners, Jennifer Arndt and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorraine East, et al v. Marissa McDermott, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE C. EAST and LA'NADREA A. MILLER
Defendant:
MARISSA MCDERMOTT, BENJAMIN T. BALLOU, FRANCISCAN HEALTH CROWN POINT and others
May v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Edith Mae May
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shafia Jones v. Jennifer McDermott
as 24-1490
Petitioner:
SHAFIA JONES
Respondent:
JENNIFER MCDERMOTT, Warden
Mark Gill v. City of Hammond, Indiana, et al
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
MARK A. GILL
Defendant:
CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, THOMAS MCDERMOTT, HAMMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
