Cases 1 - 10 of 156
McKinny v. McDowell et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Defendant:
N McDowell and T Brandmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Haar v. McDowell
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Respondent:
Nicole McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDowell-Dresden v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Gregory McDowell-Dresden
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McDowell, Titus v. Seventh Ave, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Titus McDowell
Defendant:
Seventh Ave, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Aliyah Monroe v. Timothy McDowell
as 23-3040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALIYAH MONROE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY MCDOWELL
McDowell v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13042
Plaintiff:
Shakia McDowell
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Monroe v. McDowell
as 3:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Aliyah Monroe
Defendant:
Timothy McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fulton v. United Employee Benefit Fund et al
as 1:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
JOE D. FULTON, individually, and as a representative of a Class of Participants and Beneficiaries of the United Employee Benefit Fund, and Joe D. Fulton
Defendant:
United Employee Benefit Fund, GARY MEYERS, JOHN FERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
USA v. Timothy McDowell
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY P. MCDOWELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
