Cases 1 - 10 of 4,157
Soto, Jose v. Staneic et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jose Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Staneic, CO II Billy, Sgt. Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell, Angela v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Angela Campbell
Defendant:
Governor Tony Evers, Associated Bank, N.A., Aaron J. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00972
Petitioner:
CHARLES MILLER
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
OUIDA NAKIA MILLER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SHAW v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SHAW
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR, MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A MILLER'S MERRY MANOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornelius Carolina v. Robert Miller
as 24-1974
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS CAROLINA
Respondent:
ROBERT MILLER, Warden
Miller v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04660
Plaintiff:
Dominica Miller
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Eric L Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Shaw, Terrance v. Bohlman, Nicole et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Shaw
Defendant:
Nicole Bohlman, Jenna Theler and Paul Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R. v. Starr Austen & Miller, LLP
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
G. R.
Defendant:
Starr Austen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
