Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
REAVES v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv01982
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. REAVES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH and JOHN MERSHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05610
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Towanda Reaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reaves v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04490
Plaintiff:
Colleen Reaves
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Derek Boyd v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-2294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK L. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., KRISTEN DAUSS, Doctor, ANGELA REAVES and others
BOYD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., KRISTEN DAUSS, ANGELA REAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAVES v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS A. REAVES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSLEY v. REAVES et al
as 1:2021cv02058
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Respondent:
ANGELA REAVES and RYAN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPARKS v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01635
Defendant:
MR. WILSON, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS., GEO GROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL HERBERT SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
REAVES v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02945
Defendant:
KRIS PRYOR, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JENNIFER STURM and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
