Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Walker v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Walker v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 22-1279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Program Director, ERIK KUNKEL, DORA LUCAS, Security Therapy Aide IV and others
Walker v. Schonasky et al
as 2:2021cv00675
Defendant:
Alison Schonasky, Jeremy Staniec and Brent Plate
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2019cv04055
Defendant:
Jennifer Blaesing, Doctor John Doe, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hernandez
as 2:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Capt Friend, Christopher Schmaling, CO Vela and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04014
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Steve Dredge, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv05752
Plaintiff:
Michael Clemons, Christine Triebold, Janice Smith and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grissom, Terrance et al v. Schmaling, Christopher
as 3:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Terrance Grissom and Ronald Walker
Defendant:
Christopher Schmaling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Jumper et al
as 3:2014cv03029
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Aimee Wilczynski, Shelly Ganz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Scott et al
as 3:2013cv03261
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Marie Durant, Cynthia Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
